Message84134
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, sjoerd, vstinner |
| Date | 2009-03-25.00:34:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.964906e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1237941293.24.0.742587119029.issue4591@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
pitrou> The documentation for PyArg_ParseTuple states that the pitrou> "I" code doesn't do any overflow checking. Does it mean pitrou> the input parameters can be silently truncated? I'm sorry, but you're right :-) My patch was wrong. New patch introduces functions parse_uid() and parse_gid() doing the right thing to get an unsigned uid and gid. I reused the parsing code from posix_setgroups(). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-03-25 00:34:53 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, sjoerd, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou |
| 2009-03-25 00:34:53 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1237941293.24.0.742587119029.issue4591@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-03-25 00:34:51 | vstinner | link | issue4591 messages |
| 2009-03-25 00:34:51 | vstinner | create | |