Message84414
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | georg.brandl, lemburg, mark.dickinson, nnorwitz, tim.peters |
| Date | 2009-03-29.16:17:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | 5.383327e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1238343470.88.0.146085728587.issue532631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The worst-case length calculations look fine to me, except that on a system with sizeof(int) == 8 (yes, they do exist!) the precision could end up being more than 10 digits. I've added a check for that in r70682. The docs also already mention the %f -> %g conversion, so I think all Tim's points have been addressed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-03-29 16:17:51 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, lemburg, tim.peters, nnorwitz, georg.brandl |
| 2009-03-29 16:17:50 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1238343470.88.0.146085728587.issue532631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-03-29 16:17:49 | mark.dickinson | link | issue532631 messages |
| 2009-03-29 16:17:49 | mark.dickinson | create | |