Message85101
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akuchling, djarb, facundobatista, forest, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, intgr, jafo, josiahcarlson, kevinwatters, markb |
| Date | 2009-04-01.22:01:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.9257109e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1238623291.71.0.123243289406.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Well arguably asyncore is unsalvageable due to the undocumented internals issue, and we sure know a bit more about how to design a *good* asynchronous API than we did when asyncore was created. (One hint: don't make subclassing part of your API.) The Zope folks at the meeting in all seriousness proposed reverting to the 2.5 version of asyncore since "it is broken in 2.6". Since I don't use it myself I really have no idea if anyone is using the 2.6 version. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-04-01 22:01:32 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, akuchling, facundobatista, jafo, josiahcarlson, forest, giampaolo.rodola, kevinwatters, djarb, markb, intgr |
| 2009-04-01 22:01:31 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1238623291.71.0.123243289406.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-04-01 22:01:30 | gvanrossum | link | issue1641 messages |
| 2009-04-01 22:01:29 | gvanrossum | create | |