Message86335
| Author | movement |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, bretthoerner, chrismiles, danchr, jcea, laca, movement, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, sirg3, skip.montanaro, twleung |
| Date | 2009-04-22.21:17:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.387066e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1240435056.83.0.655098164584.issue4111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, my mistake. I noticed this typo in the original patch:
207 +PyObject *
208 +PyEval_EvalFrameexEx(PyFrameObject *f, int throwflag))
Can you:
- verify that HAVE_DTRACE is indeed defined for ceval.c
- do an nm on ceval.o and look which Eval* functions you do have
Somehow, PyEval_EvalFrameEx seems not to be ending up in the .o file. It
should be easy for you to work out why... |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-04-22 21:17:36 | movement | set | recipients: + movement, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, bretthoerner, laca, twleung, robert.kern, sirg3, chrismiles, danchr |
| 2009-04-22 21:17:36 | movement | set | messageid: <1240435056.83.0.655098164584.issue4111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-04-22 21:17:35 | movement | link | issue4111 messages |
| 2009-04-22 21:17:35 | movement | create | |