Message86960
| Author | pakal |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jnoller, pakal |
| Date | 2009-05-02.17:10:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.9291293e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1241284225.29.0.682715826658.issue5906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree that for someone who discovers the multiprocessing api as a "generalization" of the threading api, there won't be problems ; I'm just worried about those (like me) who will see "daemonic" as coming from unix processes, and not the threading library B-) Cheers, pascal |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-05-02 17:10:25 | pakal | set | recipients: + pakal, jnoller |
| 2009-05-02 17:10:25 | pakal | set | messageid: <1241284225.29.0.682715826658.issue5906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-05-02 17:10:23 | pakal | link | issue5906 messages |
| 2009-05-02 17:10:22 | pakal | create | |