Message87893
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, r.david.murray, steven.daprano, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2009-05-16.13:52:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.774572e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1242481928.14.0.885830057685.issue6017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The precisionist in me insists that at a minimum 'will' should be changed to 'may'. Otherwise either the docs are lying or the implementation has a bug. Or perhaps we could add a footnote about the intentionally divergent behavior of the CPython implementation? (As Terry pointed out these docs may be used by other implementors as a prescriptive guide, just as the language reference is.) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-05-16 13:52:08 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, benjamin.peterson, steven.daprano |
| 2009-05-16 13:52:08 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1242481928.14.0.885830057685.issue6017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-05-16 13:52:06 | r.david.murray | link | issue6017 messages |
| 2009-05-16 13:52:06 | r.david.murray | create | |