Message89400
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, conf, ncoghlan, pitrou, trott |
| Date | 2009-06-15.10:39:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.0909341e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1245062353.59.0.57108510086.issue5811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The doc revision definitely does a better job of characterising the current underspecified behaviour :) I agree with Antoine that "at most a single read" would be better wording. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-06-15 10:39:13 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, trott, conf |
| 2009-06-15 10:39:13 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1245062353.59.0.57108510086.issue5811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-06-15 10:39:12 | ncoghlan | link | issue5811 messages |
| 2009-06-15 10:39:12 | ncoghlan | create | |