Message93007
| Author | theller |
|---|---|
| Recipients | doughellmann, eric.smith, exarkun, georg.brandl, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, theller, vinay.sajip |
| Date | 2009-09-22.19:01:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.8370048e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4AB91F1D.4090100@ctypes.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1253566957.11.0.0207988326745.issue6958@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Jean-Paul Calderone: > > How about putting this into the logging module instead? Instead of > "python <logging options> <program> <program options>", making it > "python -m logging <logging options> <program> <program options". > > This: > > * involves no changes to the core interpreter > * only requires Python to be written, not C > * Lets other VMs benefit from the feature immediately > * Follows what seems to be the emerging convention for this kind of > (eg pdb, unittest) > * Still allows logging to be configured for arbitrary programs that > wouldn't otherwise be configurable in this way This is a very good idea, and fully covers my use case. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-09-22 19:01:55 | theller | set | recipients: + theller, georg.brandl, vinay.sajip, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, doughellmann, r.david.murray, michael.foord |
| 2009-09-22 19:01:54 | theller | link | issue6958 messages |
| 2009-09-22 19:01:54 | theller | create | |