Message93380
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, gregory.p.smith, ned.deily, r.david.murray, schmir, twb |
| Date | 2009-09-30.22:50:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.6578217e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1254351050.4.0.500781813967.issue6972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The patch won't work if the target file already exists as a symlink. I think that such a check is not a good idea. Using symlinks to extract files to somewhere else may be a feature, after all. Specially if the symlink already exists before the operation. Some real-case example: /home/xxx/bin --> symlink to /someotherpath/bin /home/xxx/lib --> symlink to /someotherpath/lib Now I want to extract "lib/libXXX.so" into "/home/xxx" I suggest to only update the documentation with a warning, similar to the one for the tarfile module. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-09-30 22:50:50 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, gregory.p.smith, schmir, ned.deily, r.david.murray, twb |
| 2009-09-30 22:50:50 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | messageid: <1254351050.4.0.500781813967.issue6972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-09-30 22:50:48 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue6972 messages |
| 2009-09-30 22:50:48 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |