Message94613
| Author | wrichert |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, rhettinger, wrichert |
| Date | 2009-10-28.08:13:51 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.2964239e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1256717633.08.0.644715697972.issue7212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
No particular reason, besides that it is ripped off of pop(). Your solution (omitting "register") gives the same performance. Looks cleaner, of course. The patch tries to provide a clean way of "for x in some_set: break", as explained above. See the recent python-dev mailing list musings. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-10-28 08:13:53 | wrichert | set | recipients: + wrichert, rhettinger, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson |
| 2009-10-28 08:13:53 | wrichert | set | messageid: <1256717633.08.0.644715697972.issue7212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-10-28 08:13:51 | wrichert | link | issue7212 messages |
| 2009-10-28 08:13:51 | wrichert | create | |