Message97552
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.smith, mark.dickinson, skrah, tim.peters |
| Date | 2010-01-10.21:53:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.567605e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1263160424.35.0.150803455187.issue7632@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Showing once again that a proof of FP code correctness is about as > compelling as a proof of God's ontological status ;-) Clearly we need a 1000-page Isabelle/HOL-style machine-checked formal proof, rather than a ten-page TeX proof. Any takers? All of the above bugs seem to have been introduced with the new 'bigcomp' code that arrived on March 16, 2009, just a couple of weeks before I downloaded the version that got adapted for Python; in retrospect, I probably should have used the NO_STRTOD_BIGCOMP #define to bypass the new code. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-01-10 21:53:44 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, eric.smith, skrah |
| 2010-01-10 21:53:44 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1263160424.35.0.150803455187.issue7632@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-01-10 21:53:42 | mark.dickinson | link | issue7632 messages |
| 2010-01-10 21:53:42 | mark.dickinson | create | |