Message97856
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, dmalcolm, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2010-01-15.22:41:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0014246965 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1263595305.01.0.536419842471.issue6690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
No, you can't rely on the repr of a frozenset with multiple items. You should find another way of testing (if you are brave you could match the "frozenset(...)" with a regex and eval() it). Some comments on the patch: - there's a line or two in peephole.c which seems to use spaces for indentation; please always use tabs (for this file anyway) - instead of `self.assertTrue(X in Y)`, you can use `self.assertIn(X, Y)` (and `self.assertNotIn(X, Y)` for the negation) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-01-15 22:41:45 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, alex, dmalcolm |
| 2010-01-15 22:41:45 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1263595305.01.0.536419842471.issue6690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-01-15 22:41:43 | pitrou | link | issue6690 messages |
| 2010-01-15 22:41:43 | pitrou | create | |