Message98541
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | facundobatista, jjconti, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah |
| Date | 2010-01-29.21:47:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.007193348 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1264801630.74.0.930347159441.issue7633@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, indeed 'canonical' can be justified to take an integer, if we interpret the spec as: 'canonical' takes an operand and returns the preferred _decimal_ encoding of that operand. But then 'is_canonical' should return false for an integer, and this would create another special case: Accept an operand and return something meaningful _without_ converting it first. I think this is why I have problems with those two. 'number_class' is less of a problem. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-01-29 21:47:10 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, jjconti |
| 2010-01-29 21:47:10 | skrah | set | messageid: <1264801630.74.0.930347159441.issue7633@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-01-29 21:47:09 | skrah | link | issue7633 messages |
| 2010-01-29 21:47:08 | skrah | create | |