complex-numbers: naming inconsistencies
I am currently creating method stubs for Exercises and when working on the compley-numbers exercise I've noticed an inconsistency in the naming of some methods: The methods are sometimes named after the mathematical operators and sometimes after established function names in programming.
An example of that are the Operators + and -. + is named add while - is named minus.
With the method stubs it will be clear which method is responsible for which action but I still think that the naming convention should be unified for increased clarity.
Personally I like the usage of already established names, so I would propose the following name refactorings:
+:add->add(no change)-:minus->sub*:times->mult/mul/:div->div(no change)e^x:exponentialOf->exp