Description

• cleans up unused config
• allows suggestion to render results

Validation

Related Issues

Started work against #8376
According to the report, #8352 introduced the regressions.
#8380 Seems to have no bearing on the behavior.

Check List

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
• I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
• I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing.
• I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors.
• I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

👋 Codeowner Review Request

The following codeowners have been identified for the changed files:

Team reviewers: @nodejs/nodejs-website

Please review the changes when you have a chance. Thank you! 🙏

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.35%. Comparing base (a457df9) to head (4adacbe).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8381      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.40%   76.35%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines        9928     9905      -23     
  Branches      334      334              
==========================================
- Hits         7585     7563      -22     
+ Misses       2341     2340       -1     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📦 Build Size Comparison

Summary

Changes