bpo-27671: Update FAQ about why len is function (GH-8432) · python/cpython@c48e26d
@@ -215,24 +215,25 @@ objects using the ``for`` statement. For example, :term:`file objects
215215Why does Python use methods for some functionality (e.g. list.index()) but functions for other (e.g. len(list))?
216216----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
217217218-The major reason is history. Functions were used for those operations that were
219-generic for a group of types and which were intended to work even for objects
220-that didn't have methods at all (e.g. tuples). It is also convenient to have a
221-function that can readily be applied to an amorphous collection of objects when
222-you use the functional features of Python (``map()``, ``zip()`` et al).
223-224-In fact, implementing ``len()``, ``max()``, ``min()`` as a built-in function is
225-actually less code than implementing them as methods for each type. One can
226-quibble about individual cases but it's a part of Python, and it's too late to
227-make such fundamental changes now. The functions have to remain to avoid massive
228-code breakage.
229-230-.. XXX talk about protocols?
231-232-.. note::
233-234- For string operations, Python has moved from external functions (the
235- ``string`` module) to methods. However, ``len()`` is still a function.
218+As Guido said:
219+220+ (a) For some operations, prefix notation just reads better than
221+ postfix -- prefix (and infix!) operations have a long tradition in
222+ mathematics which likes notations where the visuals help the
223+ mathematician thinking about a problem. Compare the easy with which we
224+ rewrite a formula like x*(a+b) into x*a + x*b to the clumsiness of
225+ doing the same thing using a raw OO notation.
226+227+ (b) When I read code that says len(x) I *know* that it is asking for
228+ the length of something. This tells me two things: the result is an
229+ integer, and the argument is some kind of container. To the contrary,
230+ when I read x.len(), I have to already know that x is some kind of
231+ container implementing an interface or inheriting from a class that
232+ has a standard len(). Witness the confusion we occasionally have when
233+ a class that is not implementing a mapping has a get() or keys()
234+ method, or something that isn't a file has a write() method.
235+236+ -- https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-November/004643.html
236237237238238239Why is join() a string method instead of a list or tuple method?