bpo-27671: Update FAQ about why len is function (GH-8432) · python/cpython@dc9039d
@@ -226,24 +226,25 @@ Python file objects support the iterator protocol, so you can now write simply::
226226Why does Python use methods for some functionality (e.g. list.index()) but functions for other (e.g. len(list))?
227227----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
228228229-The major reason is history. Functions were used for those operations that were
230-generic for a group of types and which were intended to work even for objects
231-that didn't have methods at all (e.g. tuples). It is also convenient to have a
232-function that can readily be applied to an amorphous collection of objects when
233-you use the functional features of Python (``map()``, ``zip()`` et al).
234-235-In fact, implementing ``len()``, ``max()``, ``min()`` as a built-in function is
236-actually less code than implementing them as methods for each type. One can
237-quibble about individual cases but it's a part of Python, and it's too late to
238-make such fundamental changes now. The functions have to remain to avoid massive
239-code breakage.
240-241-.. XXX talk about protocols?
242-243-.. note::
244-245- For string operations, Python has moved from external functions (the
246- ``string`` module) to methods. However, ``len()`` is still a function.
229+As Guido said:
230+231+ (a) For some operations, prefix notation just reads better than
232+ postfix -- prefix (and infix!) operations have a long tradition in
233+ mathematics which likes notations where the visuals help the
234+ mathematician thinking about a problem. Compare the easy with which we
235+ rewrite a formula like x*(a+b) into x*a + x*b to the clumsiness of
236+ doing the same thing using a raw OO notation.
237+238+ (b) When I read code that says len(x) I *know* that it is asking for
239+ the length of something. This tells me two things: the result is an
240+ integer, and the argument is some kind of container. To the contrary,
241+ when I read x.len(), I have to already know that x is some kind of
242+ container implementing an interface or inheriting from a class that
243+ has a standard len(). Witness the confusion we occasionally have when
244+ a class that is not implementing a mapping has a get() or keys()
245+ method, or something that isn't a file has a write() method.
246+247+ -- https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-November/004643.html
247248248249249250Why is join() a string method instead of a list or tuple method?