bpo-36540 What's New section for PEP 570 by gvanrossum · Pull Request #12942 · python/cpython
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Thanks for doing this! I will land this after GH-12701 as this is more likely to have merge conflicts (as it has as the time of writing this) and I prefer not to rebase multiple times a PR that is already very big. Also, I will make a separate PR with all the doc changes that are more likely to need native speaker reviews.
OK, fixed the merge conflict (of my own making). Are you gonna make alpha 4?
That's my intention but I am still waiting for a review from @serhiy-storchaka (Victor already approved). If we are very close to the date, I would like to merge it (maybe without the changes in inspect as Serhiy suggested) and then we can fix particular details afterwards.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than my one optional style note, I see no problems with the grammar and style of this.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters