feat: optimize incoming parser by reducing call stack by bdraco · Pull Request #1116 · python-zeroconf/python-zeroconf

Codecov Report

Base: 99.95% // Head: 99.72% // Decreases project coverage by -0.23% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (272a5b0) compared to base (524ae89).
Patch coverage: 98.24% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1116      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.95%   99.72%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files          21       22       +1     
  Lines        2459     2561     +102     
  Branches      443      452       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         2458     2554      +96     
- Misses          0        5       +5     
- Partials        1        2       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/zeroconf/_cache.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_core.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_exceptions.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_history.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_logger.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_utils/name.py 98.36% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_utils/time.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/const.py 97.36% <ø> (ø)
src/zeroconf/_protocol/incoming.py 98.84% <96.82%> (ø)
src/zeroconf/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 15 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.