[Python-3000] Py3k release schedule worries
Tony Lownds
tony at PageDNA.com
Tue Dec 19 17:44:10 CET 2006
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list
Tue Dec 19 17:44:10 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Py3k release schedule worries
- Next message: [Python-3000] Py3k release schedule worries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 18, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 12/18/06, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > >>> - optional signature annotations (but without type checking >>> connotations); e.g. ``def foo(a: 42) -> "hello kitty": pass'' should >>> be fine; see my Artima blogs >> >> I have been thinking about this one, especially after the >> discussions of the >> patch floating around that has an initial implementation. I was >> planning on >> tackling this at some point so it was nice and simple (just store >> strings >> instead of actual types so it truly just documentation initially) >> and tied >> into my signature PEP. > > Oops, I must have missed that there is a patch. Where? > I did post a patch... #1607548. I'd be grateful for some review. I've asked Colin Winter to be co-author of the PEP. I'll post a new version of that in a couple of days when I have more downtime. Thanks -Tony
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Py3k release schedule worries
- Next message: [Python-3000] Py3k release schedule worries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list