[python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Aug 14 06:14:07 CEST 2008
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Thu Aug 14 06:14:07 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
- Next message: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 13, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> Because there won't typically be sufficient testing and release >>> infrastructure to allow arbitrary bug fixes to be committed on the >>> branch. The buildbots are turned off, and nobody tests the release >>> candidate, no Windows binaries are provided - thus, chances are very >>> high that a bug fix release for some very old branch will be *worse* >>> than the previous release, rather than better. >> >> Why is that qualitatively different than a security fix? All the >> same >> conditions apply. > > No. The problem being fixed is completely different. For a security > fix, > it is typically fairly obvious what the bug being fixed is (in > particular, if you look at the recent ones dealing with overflows): > the > interpreter crashes without the patch, and stops crashing (but raises > an exception instead) with the patch. That's true of a certain class of bugs, probably mostly in the C code. I think potential security bugs in Python code will be closer to "regular" bug fixes. >> I'm glad it wasn't much effort. Would you propose using >> technological >> means to close the branch? > > They are still open for security patches (well, 2.4 is; under my > proposed policy, 2.3 isn't anymore). If people think it's desirable, > we could rename the branch, or we could enforce a certain keyword > (e.g. "security") in the commit messages. I was thinking about preventing commits on the branch. Most security fixes of the type you describe come in through the psrt, and they may even be embargoed. For a closed branch, you'd open it for the security patches when the embargo is lifted, make the commits, then close it again. That would at least be a very strong clue that the branch is closed :). - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSKOxEHEjvBPtnXfVAQLnDwP/SxtyECt++5uvFKdwIkop7xP2tyLy7IBW sigKb7WOvVH/Iiz16xf7zdEuXqsV1h59QvPDCzwk8/6VTggjbfhZ9qt+PdwlClzL cbc1JFI0DSDQ8tVOiPtJhsvvAhXMAlZI5FmMRxp77Cc3y9JUwczxzIP2fXw4IvUQ K6WO3bLbY5s= =USCq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
- Next message: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list