[python-committers] Snakebite buildbot slaves: opinions wanted
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Tue Apr 28 01:21:13 CEST 2009
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Tue Apr 28 01:21:13 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [python-committers] Snakebite buildbot slaves: opinions wanted
- Next message: [python-committers] Snakebite buildbot slaves: opinions wanted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Trent Nelson wrote: > FWIW, I presented the same option to the Twisted folk, and they > said > they'd prefer to use their existing buildbot master, claiming that > they're used to unreliable buildbots and false-positive e-mail > noti- > fication, and noting that they have something similar to our own > 'stable' buildbot view that slaves are promoted to once they've > dem- > onstrated they're not falling over every other commit. > > (Additionally, we agreed that we could set up a 'snakebite' > buildbot > view for all the Snakebite slaves, which has numerous benefits; we > could do this for Python as well.) That seems like a wise precedence to follow. +1 for us doing the same. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20090427/454c67d5/attachment.pgp>
- Previous message: [python-committers] Snakebite buildbot slaves: opinions wanted
- Next message: [python-committers] Snakebite buildbot slaves: opinions wanted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list