[python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Feb 26 01:03:21 CET 2009
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Thu Feb 26 01:03:21 CET 2009
- Previous message: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn
- Next message: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: >> There's an option missing in that survey: >> >> [ ] I see a need to switch to a DVCS at all. > > To be fair, the survey isn't asking about a switch, just how they > compare > against svn. > > But I must admin that seems a little strange; while I just answered > that I > believe hg and bzr are better than svn (I abstained re git), that > *doesn't* > necessarily imply I would vote that they should replace svn for > Python - I > might, but I might not - that is a much harder question than the one > presented. Note that not switching from svn on the backend, but still allowing access with bzr, hg, and git is also an option. And there are two subcategories of that: we provide mirrors of svn branches in the native format, and we do nothing, allowing the dvcs's use their svn- bridges to access the branches. Although I think in either case we could provide hosting support for core committers. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSaXcSXEjvBPtnXfVAQLreQP/c06y3vUTLqhGJrKgiWvajWy6p96kqQ8o 6WcYp9XXXoDRHsZNFRm8z3Ck+aRCEEB3CmINHSCYdMxR9m43YhwHO/IEjtq6/+WG c0LtqXt+BrpfX2UvwG5LVmA4YMR35tnEzMlPNJaWLd8s2NbKyK8Gamnzc6aNhDap ltNiwPlMDew= =w48j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn
- Next message: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list