Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Jul 22 14:24:06 CEST 2010

• Previous message: [python-committers] PEP checkin process
• Next message: [python-committers] PEP checkin process
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Thank you all for the answers!
The PEP (numbered 3151) is now discussed on python-ideas.

Regards

Antoine.



Le mercredi 21 juillet 2010 à 12:01 -0400, David Goodger a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:34, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> > Can a committer check-in their own PEP directly, or do they have to go
> > through the peps at python.org process?
> 
> As long as the PEP is formatted correctly and conforms to PEP 1 (PEP
> Purpose and Guidelines), committers are welcome to handle their PEPs
> directly. Less experienced PEP authors should send drafts to
> peps at python.org for editorial guidance. The PEP editors are there to
> help polish your text and avoid omissions & embarrassing errors.
> 
> IOW, as a committer you're welcome to short-circuit the PEP process,
> but if you do, the egg will be on your own face ;-)
> 

---

• Previous message: [python-committers] PEP checkin process
• Next message: [python-committers] PEP checkin process
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list