[python-committers] Is 3.1 open?
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 22:26:10 CET 2010
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Wed Mar 17 22:26:10 CET 2010
- Previous message: [python-committers] Is 3.1 open?
- Next message: [python-committers] Is 3.1 open?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 03:52 +0100, Jesus Cea a écrit : >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/14/2010 03:35 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>>> Mercurial, where are you?. This would be a non issue :) >>> How so? >> The release manager could clone the repository to getting it ready for >> release, while the main repository accepts new changesets. The point >> would be not stopping commits, ever. > > We could already do so with SVN, simply by opening a release branch when > entering rc phase, and only merging selected (release blocking) fixes to > that branch. There's nothing DVCS-specific here. I came across an interesting explanation from Joel Spolsky the other day as to why this isn't actually true (even with svnmerge): http://hginit.com/00.html Short version: SVN and other non-DVCS systems don't store enough (or the right) metadata to support merging properly, so branching becomes unnecessarily painful. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [python-committers] Is 3.1 open?
- Next message: [python-committers] Is 3.1 open?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list