Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 22:45:39 CEST 2011

• Previous message: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
• Next message: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> Can you be more precise? How did you do that?
>
> See the example that he gave, e.g. r82065. The changes are in
> /sandbox/branches/py3k-datetime.

Martin mostly answered Antoine's question for me.    You can get more
details by comparing the history of Lib/datetime.py in hg and svn.

The annotated view is completely inaccurate as a result:

$ svn blame -v Lib/datetime.py | awk '{print $2}'| sort | uniq -c
 664 alexander.belopolsky
   2 bcannon
 319 gvanrossum
1123 tim_one

$ hg blame -vu Lib/datetime.py | awk '{print $1,$2}'| sort | uniq -c
2112 Alexander Belopolsky

It looks like this history survived the cvs to svn migration, but was
lost in migration to hg.

---

• Previous message: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
• Next message: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list