[python-committers] Relicensing source code for inclusion in Python
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Apr 4 19:03:14 CEST 2013
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Thu Apr 4 19:03:14 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [python-committers] Relicensing source code for inclusion in Python
- Next message: [python-committers] Relicensing source code for inclusion in Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 04, 2013, at 06:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >In http://bugs.python.org/issue17618, I proposed adding a base85 >implementation to Python. Mercurial already has one (under the GPL), so >I wrote to the authors (Brendan Cully and Mads Kiilerich) and got their >informal approval for relicensing and inclusion in Python. > >My question is the following: does anything formal need to be done to >validate the relicensing? If yes, what? That's a good question. In optimism for a positive pronouncement, I'm preparing a 4.0 version of flufl.enum, which is currently LGPLv3+. I intend to do the next release under an ASLv2.0 license in order to be compatible with the contributor agreement. It's too much of a PITA for me to do dual licenses and since ASLv2.0 is GPL-compatible, that seems fine enough for me. Is that enough for contribution to Python? -Barry
- Previous message: [python-committers] Relicensing source code for inclusion in Python
- Next message: [python-committers] Relicensing source code for inclusion in Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list