Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 14:39:09 CET 2013

• Previous message: [python-committers] Anatoly Techtonik's contribution
• Next message: [python-committers] New mailing list: Python-legal-sig
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be
>> compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its own set of issues.
>> 
>> That all said; again, the likelihood of short term alteration of the CLA is
>> a non starter, so he can feel free to take his time to understand why we
>> require contributions to be licensed to the PSF under the listed licenses.
>> 
>> However; I've sent this to a real lawyer for his opinion.
> 
> Since this came up again on python-dev, did you ever receive any reply
> from the real lawyer?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Ezio Melotti

Yup, but we sort of got distracted with a protracted trademark dispute legal thing that's slightly more important. I'm working it

---

• Previous message: [python-committers] Anatoly Techtonik's contribution
• Next message: [python-committers] New mailing list: Python-legal-sig
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list