Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Mon Jun 10 10:12:07 CEST 2013

• Previous message: [python-committers] hg clone cpython newrepo aborts
• Next message: [python-committers] Language Summit at EuroPython
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 05/29/2013 10:27 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:41 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com
> <mailto:rdmurray at bitdance.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     I asked about this on IRC and was told that 3.2 is now a standalone branch
>     like 2.7.  Security fixes will be applied by the release manager only,
>     and Georg doesn't see any point in null merging the commits.
> 
> 
> Well, there is no harm in merging 3.2 to 3.3. I think, 3.1 remains merged to 3.2
> even if 3.1 is under security only mode.
> 
> It will be our practice that we do not port bug fixes to 3.2. This can be
> mentioned in the Misc/README. But when it will be a security fix, it will go
> through 3.2->3.3->default and having them merged may be a good idea.

No, security fixes will be cherry-picked back to the 3.2 branch, which is easier
in the case of only few standalone commits.

Georg

---

• Previous message: [python-committers] hg clone cpython newrepo aborts
• Next message: [python-committers] Language Summit at EuroPython
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list