[python-committers] 3.2 -> 3.3 merge pending?
Senthil Kumaran
senthil at uthcode.com
Wed May 29 22:27:02 CEST 2013
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Wed May 29 22:27:02 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [python-committers] 3.2 -> 3.3 merge pending?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:41 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote: > > I asked about this on IRC and was told that 3.2 is now a standalone branch > like 2.7. Security fixes will be applied by the release manager only, > and Georg doesn't see any point in null merging the commits. > > Well, there is no harm in merging 3.2 to 3.3. I think, 3.1 remains merged to 3.2 even if 3.1 is under security only mode. It will be our practice that we do not port bug fixes to 3.2. This can be mentioned in the Misc/README. But when it will be a security fix, it will go through 3.2->3.3->default and having them merged may be a good idea. -- Senthil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20130529/209da268/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [python-committers] 3.2 -> 3.3 merge pending?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list