[python-committers] Do people prefer pushing feature repos or one massive patch?
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 18:55:58 CEST 2015
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Wed Apr 1 18:55:58 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Do people prefer pushing feature repos or one massive patch?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Do people prefer pushing feature repos or one massive patch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If you choose to merge, I would prefer that you rebase your changes before to avoid multiple merges. IMO the best to avoid merges at all :-) Did someone review your large change? Victor 2015-04-01 18:09 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <bcannon at gmail.com>: > The implementation for PEP 488 is basically done (sans Windows installer > stuff). I did the work in a features repo at > https://hg.python.org/features/pep-488/ . Once I have addressed reviewer > comments at http://bugs.python.org/issue23731 , would people prefer I simply > push the features repo to hg.python.org/cpython and have the more granular > history but have various "merge default" commits, or would people rather I > do one massive commit? > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Do people prefer pushing feature repos or one massive patch?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Do people prefer pushing feature repos or one massive patch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list