[python-committers] New installed Python builders
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Mon Nov 23 16:11:19 EST 2015
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Mon Nov 23 16:11:19 EST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] New installed Python builders
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] [Python-buildbots] New installed Python builders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:11:15 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > On 23.11.15 18:00, R. David Murray wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:58:01 -0600, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't looked at this, but unless the buildbot does *not* have write > > access to the installed directories (ie: the install was done as another > > user) it isn't really doing a full installed python test. > > Yes, but at least it catches cases where some files are not installed. > There were few issues with this. True. Something incomplete in this vein is better than nothing. I'm Not sure you should call it "Installed" though, as that will be a bit misleading. Most of the "can't run the tests on installed python" bugs are because the tree is read-only (obviously, not all of them!). Maybe call it "local install"? Wordy, I know, but more accurate. --David
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] New installed Python builders
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] [Python-buildbots] New installed Python builders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list