[python-committers] Unreliable contributor stats
Antoine Pitrou
antoine at python.org
Tue Jul 18 07:57:23 EDT 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Tue Jul 18 07:57:23 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Unreliable contributor stats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le 18/07/2017 à 12:24, Victor Stinner a écrit : > > == More contributors, more contributions, faster reviewed/merged == > > In term of contributions, I looked at statistics yesterday and it > became clear the number of different authors is significantely much > higher, around 25 contributors / month before, now closer to 50: > https://www.openhub.net/p/python/contributors/summary Beware of how those numbers are calculated. When we were using hg, patches were typically committed by core developers, so only core developers appeared as "contributors" in the hg log. Now we're using GitHub, commits are made by their contributors themselves, so the git log now shows their names. (note the difference is really GitHub PRs vs. applying-patches-by-hand, not git vs. hg) Furthermore, based on https://www.openhub.net/p/python/commits/summary, it seems the latest stats collected by OpenHub date back to 30th May 2017. They are two months late. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Unreliable contributor stats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list