[python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Tue Jul 18 15:53:56 EDT 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Tue Jul 18 15:53:56 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jul 18, 2017, at 15:21, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > > I much prefer rietveld over github reviews, but I also much prefer the > integration between the bug tracker and github over the minimal > integration we had for rietveld. Thanks to all the people who made > that happen, and especially Brett for leading it. Not that I’m suggesting anything should change, but just FWIW, I find Gitlab to have a much better conversational review tool than Github. I often find myself getting lost in GH reviews (on many projects), but GL just organizes the conversation really well IMHO. Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20170718/c5b90873/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list