Home Original page

[python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Mar 9 20:01:44 EST 2017 
On 10 March 2017 at 04:32, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments?
>>
>>
>> Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from using the online
>> editor for minor fixups (GitHub doesn't give you the option to put those in
>> your fork if you have merge access on the main repo).
>>
>
> In general I expect none of those branches to live longer than 24 hours as
> the PRs they were created for should be merged in less than an hour. If a
> branch is older than a day then it means someone probably forgot to delete
> the branch after merging a PR.
>

That was the case for one of mine, but for the other, it was a matter of
needing to run "git remote prune" to clean up the already deleted branch
for anyone that had sync'ed it already.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20170310/62c47a62/attachment.html>
More information about the python-committers mailing list