[python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
Martin Panter
vadmium+py at gmail.com
Fri Mar 10 20:38:28 EST 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Fri Mar 10 20:38:28 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > Is the mention bot helpful? (Our config is at > https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.mention-bot and the docs are > at https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot) On 11 March 2017 at 00:32, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: > I’ve found it helpful thus far. It’s poked me on a few issues and I jumped > in and gave a review on them. There is too much churn in python/cpython for > me to get notified of every issue. I suspect as we get more people > submitting PRs (and thus, retaining author) it will get more diverse in who > it notifies as well. I dislike it. At the moment I have the Git Hub repository blocked, but this means I can’t even subscribe myself to interesting threads any more. I think there were way too many useless emails (lacking context, uninteresting to me, etc). It is automated spam. I encourage you to remove it, or at least make it opt-in. Perhaps you can encourage contributors to look themselves at the “experts” list, history of the relevant code, or whatever, to find potential people to invite to a Git Hub discussion.
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list