[python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Thu Mar 16 12:16:39 EDT 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Thu Mar 16 12:16:39 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 20:24 R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:56:33 -0400, Yury Selivanov < > yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > > It's not just long waiting times (although it's a huge factor), it's > > that you have to create temporary branches for cherry-picks. With > > scripts or without, it's a lot of bookkeeping. Also, interacting with a > > console is still much more convenient than using web tools (at least for > > me). > > +100 :) > I'm afraid this one is going to come down to personal preference because I actually pref the web UI. :) But we will keep working at this to see if we can't find a happy medium somehow. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20170316/f3f75d80/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list