Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Mar 16 13:25:46 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mar 16, 2017, at 04:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:

>Ah, you didn't say you wanted this to be a status check. :) Do we want to
>go so far as that rather than a comment or PR template?

I like it for that on my other projects, so I'm pretty sure I'd like that for
CPython.  I'm a big fan of more automated checks -when they are stable and
robust- for doing the fiddly little checks that are a pain to do manually.  I
like requiring bug reports for most things, plus style checks, etc.  It makes
it so much easier for a submitter to conform because they get immediate
feedback if they break some policy.  There's usually a strong drive to get all
the lights green.

Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20170316/e66ecb8e/attachment.sig>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list