Antoine Pitrou antoine at python.org
Mon Jan 15 17:41:55 EST 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Hi Brett,

Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less
parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI.  This may make waiting
times longer than they used to be.

Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger two sequential AppVeyor
jobs:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.6build10551

Regards

Antoine.


Le 10/01/2018 à 21:45, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> I just switched it on to help make sure we don't break on Windows just
> before hitting beta. If it turns out AppVeyor isn't stable enough I will
> switch it back off.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
> 

---

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list