Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Wed Jul 18 19:13:05 EDT 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] An alternative governance model
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] An alternative governance model
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> On Jul 18, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Fred Drake <fred at fdrake.net> wrote:
> 
> PEP 2 is (currently) the "Procedure for Adding New Modules".  Though
> superseded, recycling the PEP number seems out of character with the
> RFC process from which we derived the PEP process.  Let's be cautious
> about recycling like that; integers are cheap.

Amusingly, I went through the low numbered PEPs as a result of this, and found https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0010/ <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0010/>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180718/a0e9e348/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] An alternative governance model
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] An alternative governance model
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list