[python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Thu May 24 12:56:01 EDT 2018
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Thu May 24 12:56:01 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 13:52 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On May 22, 2018, at 12:44, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > > Hm, what's the cost of those extra repos? As long as they have > consistent names (e.g. pep-1234) they're easy to ignore right? Or does > GitHub have a quota of repos per org? > > I think there is a quota for non-paying organizations, but I’m not sure. > I was just thinking about clutter on https://github.com/python but maybe > it won’t be so bad with… > I don't think there's a quota. -Brett > > > I was thinking of a workflow where the pep author initially creates the > repo under their own username and directs discussion there. Then when their > PEP is accepted (or rejected!) they can donate their repo to the python > org. I know such a thing is possible (we did it for the mypy and typeshed > repos). > > … +1! > > > Ironically for me GitHub is less linear than email. It's easier to ask > people to open a new issue than it is to ask them to start a new thread. So > e.g. if a discussion starts about a survey of feature X in various > languages, when it veers off into a tutorial for a specific language that > could be a separate issue, and the meta-discussion on how the list of > languages should be selected could be made another issue. > > I see what you’re saying. Yes, that could work if the PEP author is > really diligent about shunting detours into new issues. I’ve just found > that within PRs or issues, the linearity can be quite difficult to follow. > (FWIW, IMHO, GitLab does better here, but that’s besides the point.) > You do realize you are very quickly volunteering to propose to write the PEP for moving issues to GitLab, right? ;) > > > I think Mark Shannon volunteered PEP 576 (though so far he hasn't > created a separate repo, he's just created a PR for the peps repo IIUC). I > hope Nick will also volunteer PEP 577 for this. > > +1 > > -Barry > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180524/a5eac04f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list