Antoine Pitrou antoine at python.org
Sat Nov 3 05:39:08 EDT 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Le 03/11/2018 à 04:40, Victor Stinner a écrit :
>>> I see that the PEP 8001 is still being updated (voting method). Should
>>> we still expect new changes before the vote starts?
>>
>> I don't detect any groundswell of opposition anymore now that the
>> voting method changed.
> 
> I'm unhappy with the "[] Further discussion" choice. We have a
> governance crisis. Many people would like to see it resolved as soon
> as possible, I don't see the ability to vote for "[] Further
> discussion" as a way to resolve this crisis.

Why are you worried?  If many people would like to see the "crisis" (I
would call it a void) resolved early, then probably "Further discussion"
won't win.  So how is its presence a problem?

Regards

Antoine.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP
• Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the python-committers mailing list