Home Original page

[python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP

Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Sat Nov 3 13:24:46 EDT 2018 
> On Nov 3, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 03/11/2018 à 16:19, Stefan Krah a écrit :
>> On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 07:22:21AM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2018 03:55 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Frankly, I feel pretty disenfranchised by the process
>>>> at the moment.
>>> 
>>> +1
>> 
>> I wouldn't go as far as disenfranchised, but just this thread made it clear
>> to me that taking in information is at least 10x faster if presented on a
>> mailing list.
>> 
>> Discourse feels like eating soup with a fork, especially now that the
>> volume is higher.
> 
> Indeed.  As soon as a discussion is starting to become branchy,
> Discourse just ruins readability compared to a normal threaded
> discussion system.  The electoral system discussion is an example of that:
> https://discuss.python.org/t/python-governance-electoral-system/290
> 

Huh, I found the experience exactly the opposite. I was just remarking last night how glad I was that the discussion happened in discourse instead of on the mailing list, because of how poorly I felt the discussion would have gone on a mailing list. The ability to trivially multi quote alone was a drastic improvement, much less the ability to control, on a topic by topic basis, what level of notification I wanted for that topic.
More information about the python-committers mailing list