[Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:14:34 -0500
Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:14:34 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> http://effbot.org/ideas/time-type.htm > > I can produce PEP and patch if necessary. Yes, a PEP, please! Jim Fulton has been asking for this for a long time too. His main requirement is that timestamp objects are small, both in memory and as pickles, because Zope keeps a lot of these around. They are currently represented either as long ints (with a little under 64 bits) or as 8-byte strings. A dedicated timestamp object could be smaller than that. Your idea of a base type (which presumably standarizes at least one form of representation) sounds like a breakthrough that can help satisfy different other needs. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]