[Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:03:33 -0500
Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:03:33 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In ZODB 4, the cache eviction may be done quite differently. The > version number may be a simple int. The last mod time will not be > provided for each object; instead, users will need to define this > themselves if they care about it. If they define it themselves, > they'd probably use a DateTime object, but we'd care much less about > how small it is. In that case, I take back everything I've said about Jim Fulton's requirements. I'm quite sure that in the past he said he needed a very lightweight date/time object, but from what you say it appears this need has disappeared. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]