[Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake@acm.org
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:31:09 -0500
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:31:09 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum writes: > Is comparison the same what Tim mentioned as range searches? I guess > a representation like current Zope timestamps or what time.time() > returns is fine for that -- it is monononous even if not necessarily > continuous. I guess a broken-out time tuple is much harder to compare. Yes; as long as ordering is easy to check, we're fine with a long int or some such thing. The range search is indeed the specific application Jim has in mind. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]