[Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
Oren Tirosh
oren-py-d@hishome.net
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 04:25:55 -0500
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 04:25:55 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
- Next message: Re[2]: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Gareth McCaughan wrote: > One drawback of allowing an arbitrary list of transformations > is that it might not be completely clear what order they're done in. > I conjecture that most people will have the same intuition > as I do about this, namely that the first-listed transformation > is applied first. (It would be less obvious if the list came > before the name of the definiendum instead of after.) The modifier order [memoize, staticmethod] sounds more like the sentence "foo is a memoized staticmethod" - at least in English it does. In French, Hebrew and several other languages it's the other way around, but Python is definitely English-oriented. So, do adjectives come before or after the noun in Dutch? :-) Oren
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
- Next message: Re[2]: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]