[Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake@acm.org
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:00:54 -0500
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:00:54 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Prescod writes: > The major reason for doing it at > compile time (for me) is that you can have a nice syntax that doesn't > evolve modulus-ing (or dividing) an otherwise useless vars() or locals() > dictionary. Which has everything to do with your usage. I almost never use % with locals() or vars(), so I don't share that motivation. I'm much more likely to build a dict specifically for the purpose, which includes computed values, or have something already created which includes this usage as part of the larger picture. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]