[Python-Dev] Re: FWD: Re: Problem w/ IDLE on Win2000
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Aug 6 22:37:21 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Aug 6 22:37:21 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: FWD: Re: Problem w/ IDLE on Win2000
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: FWD: Re: Problem w/ IDLE on Win2000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"James Kew" <james.kew at btinternet.com> wrote in message news:bgrihu$83n$1 at main.gmane.org... > "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.net> wrote in message > news:20030806141508.C32531 at starship.python.net... > > > The default path is \python23 for a reason. Why do people > > ignore the default? I wouldn't call it a bug, at most a caveat. > > IMHO, it's a bug if: > > a) the user is allowed to change the installation default, but > b) the installation (or part of it) fails to work correctly if he does. The problem is that most changes are ok but one (which people are too likely to make) is not. If \python23, etc, were required, people would complain about *that*. I suspect the Wise Installer does not have an easy option to check user entries for spaces. The root problem is Microsoft casually breaking working code for no decent reason. For perspective: A few years ago, a major company (Adaptec as I remember) automatically installed programs to \Prog Files\Adaptec\whatever that would not work there. Now *that* was an install bug. Terry J. Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: FWD: Re: Problem w/ IDLE on Win2000
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: FWD: Re: Problem w/ IDLE on Win2000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list