[spambayes-dev] RE: [Python-Dev] RE: [Spambayes] Question (orpossibly a bug report)
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Wed Aug 13 21:34:16 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Aug 13 21:34:16 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Python-Dev] RE: [Spambayes] Question (orpossibly a bug report)
- Next message: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Python-Dev] RE: [Spambayes] Question (orpossibly a bug report)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I don't understand this bit. You'd rather use an undocumented API > function than an open source, well-tested, properly licensed set of > functions? I don't know what the exact requirements of this license are, but I assure you that redistributing code that is not under the PSF license is a pain, even if it's an open source license. If we can get the original authors to contribute the code to the PSF without the requirement to include a license of any kind (beyond the PSF license) in redistributions, either by the PSF or downstream, even if those redistributions are commercial or contain proprietary code in addition to open source code. This is what's possible with the PSF license, and that needs to remain the case. In particular, the GPL is *not* acceptable for this purpose. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Python-Dev] RE: [Spambayes] Question (orpossibly a bug report)
- Next message: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Python-Dev] RE: [Spambayes] Question (orpossibly a bug report)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list